RSS订阅 加入收藏  设为首页

金沙城中心官网开户:Public Funds Funding Licensing Cheng Xiangyu 49 Companies Awaiting "Admission Tickets"

时间:2018/3/28 18:10:47  作者:  来源:  浏览:0  评论:0
内容摘要:\nWith the advent of mixed-industry era in large-capital management industry, public fund licenses have become an integral part of capital m...

\nWith the advent of mixed-industry era in large-capital management industry, public fund licenses have become an integral part of capital management as an integral part of capital management. According to the latest version issued by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the issuance and review of administrative license applications for securities and fund management institutions are publicly available. According to the table, as of March 23, 2018, there are still 49 public fund management companies waiting for the "sale permit."\n


\nJudging from the progress of the approval process, five institutions such as Guocheng Fund Management Co., Ltd., Shangzheng Fund Management Co., Ltd., and Beyond Fund Management Co., Ltd. are in the acceptance stage, and 44 institutions, including Anbang Fund Management Co., Ltd. and Ruiquan Fund Management Co., Ltd. Enter the review stage. Among them, the original Fund Management Co., Ltd. submitted the application materials for the establishment of the approval as early as December 31, 2014, and entered the second feedback day in February 2017. At present, it has not yet been approved for the exhibition industry, and it is the longest and only fund for the approval process. The company .\n


\nWith regard to the reasons for the slow release of publicly-owned licenses, senior Yang Xiaoqing believes that the regulatory slowdown of public offerings is mainly a reaction to the fierce competition in the public offering industry, excessive supply, and increased market risk. The competition in the public offering industry is fierce, the homogeneity of products is serious, and the industry exhibits a significant Matthew effect. In particular, the gold company has met the difficulties of sales difficulties, talent recruitment, and poor performance. The overall competitiveness is significantly weaker than that of the company. The old fund companies, so want to break through the Red Sea is very difficult, even if the new fund companies, the significance of the development of the current industry is not large, so more and more general, as less and fine, and secondly, there are too many in the market " Under the background of mini-funds and liquidation funds, the enthusiasm for the issuance of new funds remains high, but the sales dilemma is even more severe. In this regard, supervision encourages funds to go into inventory and strictly controls the approval of new funds so as to force companies to focus on stock funds. In this context, the slow approval of new licenses also has the effect of reducing the supply of funds. In addition, under the background of risk prevention and de-leveraging, supervision strictly controls company qualifications to screen out companies with superior management capabilities and risk control levels, which is also a protection for investors.\n


\nIn June 2013, the new fund law was implemented and public fund licenses were officially opened. In accordance with stipulated securities brokers, , and other powerful asset management agencies such as private equity, they can qualify for issuing public funds. Some companies took the lead to get “entrance tickets.” Daily Funds Network data showed that the number of fund companies newly established between 2013 and 2015 was 16, 9 and 5 respectively. In 2016, a number of newly established fund companies including AVIC, Pioneer, and Peng were established. Yang, Kai Shi, Hengshui Qianhai and other 9 fund companies. In 2017, Hengyue Fund, Oriental Alpha, and Bodao Fund were approved for establishment. In 2018, Huarong Fund and Hongyi Yuan were established.\n


\nThe reporter noted that the number of new fund establishments has turned a turning point in 2015 and 2017, and these two years have also become the establishment of a public fund company in the first year. Yang Xiaoqing explained that in 2015, the market turned from bear to bear, and the withdrawal of funds was also very large. The market was once in a panic. At this time, the enthusiasm of the company for applying for a license had subsided, and the regulatory requirements for the management of the manager were also more stringent. In 2017, the enthusiasm for the issuance of new funds was high, but the sales difficulties were even more severe. It was also reasonable to superimpose the funds that had not been issued in the previous batch and the funds were delisted. It was also reasonable to supervise the supply from the source; Approval has also become more stringent.\n


\nIn spite of the regulatory intentional tightening of approval, it appears to many people in the industry that public fund licenses are still highly favored. “The fundamental reason for favored public fund fund licenses lies in the good business prospects. Public fund is a kind of regulatory encouragement and its investment is transparent. Sexuality and soundness are in line with the development direction of the asset management industry; the new asset management regulations, the bank’s regulations and a series of measures to prevent financial risks have also formed favorable conditions for public offerings. On the other hand, the public fund has a wide audience and strong demand. The scale is easy to grow, and the prospects are broad. For fund managers, the income from management fees for floods and floods is more certain, especially in a bear market environment, which is not too much pressure.” Yang Xiaoqing said frankly.\n






所有信息均来自:百度一下 ( 金沙娱乐官方总网址)